SUBHASH CHAND BANSAL (187/11/TM/KOL) v. KHADIM HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR
IPDATM/197/2023 · 2025-02-10
Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56806 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56806 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OIP-42 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE (Intellectual Property Rights Division) IPDATM/197/2023 SUBHASH CHAND BANSAL (187/11/TM/KOL) VS KHADIM HOLDINGS PVT LTD AND ANR Before: The Hon’ble Justice RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR Date: 10th February 2025 Appearance: Mr. Avirup Chatterjee, Adv. Mr. Rishov Das, Adv. Mr. Shantanu Guchait, Adv. …for petitioner. Ms. Antara Dey, Adv. …for respondent no. 1 The Court: It is submitted on behalf of the respondents that they are not using the impugned mark ‘Khazana’ and do not intend to use the same in the near future. On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that the registration in favour of the respondents of the impugned mark has expired. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties there is no purpose in pursuing this litigation. Accordingly, IPDATM/197/2023 stands allowed.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.) SK.