Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56804 (PNJ)

SOHAN SINGH AND ORS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/13575/2025 · 2025-05-13

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

118 SOHAN SINGH AND ORS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. are being p whereas, the petitioners are entitled for said post keeping in view the judgment of this Court in No.15896 of 2023 titled and ors.”, Hon’ble Supreme Court of India directed to grant t appointed along with 2. being raised by the petitioner dated 04.11.202 same is still pending consideration with the respondents and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13575 Date of Decision : 13 SOHAN SINGH AND ORS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate Mr. R.S Sohi, Advocate for the petitioner *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners are being paid the consolidated salary whi , the petitioners are entitled for the statutory pay scale fixed for the said post keeping in view the judgment of this Court in No.15896 of 2023 titled “Saurabh Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.”, decided on 13.09.2024, which Hon’ble Supreme Court of India hence directed to grant the statutory pay scale from the date, the pointed along with arrears including all the benefits Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance being raised by the petitioners have already been raised in 11.2024, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P same is still pending consideration with the respondents and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 13575-2025 Date of Decision : 13-05-2025 ........Petitioner(s) VERSUS ........Respondent(s) HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI vocate for Advocate for the petitioners. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) petitioners argues that the petitioners he consolidated salary while working on the post of Clerk the statutory pay scale fixed for the said post keeping in view the judgment of this Court in Court in CWP “Saurabh Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Punjab judgment has been upheld upto hence, the respondents are liable to be statutory pay scale from the date, the petitioners were including all the benefits with interest. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance have already been raised in the legal not as been appended as Annexure P-9 but the same is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioners ........Petitioner(s) ........Respondent(s) HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI petitioners le working on the post of Clerk the statutory pay scale fixed for the Court in CWP “Saurabh Sharma and ors. Vs. State of Punjab the liable to be were Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance the legal notice but the the petitioners SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.13 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13575-2025 -2- will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner. 3 Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the legal notice dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P-9) has been received in the office of the concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order. Learned counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the petitioners in the speaking order to be passed and the said order will be duly conveyed to the petitioners. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in view the statement of learned counsel for the respondent-State, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further. 6. Ordered accordingly. 13-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.13 16:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document