APHC010290122017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19560/2017 Between: 1. THE KAKINADA SEAPORTS LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, K.V. SEKHARA RAO, S/O. HANUMANTHA RAO, 2"D FLOOR, PORT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, BEACH ROAD, KAKINADA 533 007 2. THE MANAGER, H.R & ADMIN.,, KAKINADA SEAPORTS LIMITED, 2"D FLOOR, PORT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, BEACH ROAD, KAKINADA - 533 007 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, EMPLOYMENT, TRAINING AND FACTORIES, 5TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO. 159, A.P. SECRETARIAT OFFICE 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, 2-43-29/1, JYOTHULA SREERAM BUILDING, BHASKARA NAGAR, KAKINADA 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, 2-43-29/1, JYOTHULA SREERAM BUILDING, BHASKARA NAGAR, KAKINADA 4. P VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. APPA RAO, H.NO. 16-42-125, SAMBAMURTHYNAGAR, 5TH STREET, KAKINADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring that the order dated 25-03-2017 passed by Respondent No. 3 in A.P.S.E.Appeal No. 1 of 2016 and the order dated 16- 02-2015 passed by Respondent No. 2 in A.P.S.E. No. 2 of 2010 as being contrary to law and, consequently, uphold the termination order issued to Respondent No. 4 by the Petitioner dated 27-11-2009 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 23858 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order staying all further proceedings pursuant to the order dated 25- 03-2017 passed by Respondent No. 3 in A.P.S.E.Appeal No.1 of 2016 and the order dated 16-02-2015 passed by Respondent No. 2 in A.P.S.E. 2 of 2010 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CH PUSHYAM KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. N SIVA REDDY 2. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Shiraj, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through online submits that respondent No.4 is no more and in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 19.12.2025 Dvs 40 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.19560 of 2017 Date: 19.12.2025 Dvs