Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37080-DB RFA No. 1372 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1372 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI BRAMANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE BHAGAVANTHAPPA RESIDENT OF MUTUR 6TH DIVISION
DODDABALLAPURA TOWN 562 163 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
2.
SRI M NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O ANJINAPPA R/O NAGADENAHALLI POST DODDABALLAPURA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 163. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VINAYA KUMAR.N.D, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SRI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 EYARS S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA RESDIING AT NAGADENAHALLI VILLAGE
KONAGATTA POST KASABA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK 562 163 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37080-DB RFA No. 1372 of 2023
2.
SRI BHAGAVANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA RESIDING AT NAGADENAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK 562 163 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
3.
SRI NANJUNDAPPAA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA RESIDING AT NAGADENAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DODDABALLAPURA TALUK 562 163 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
4.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA N H 207 NEAR SRIGANDA PETROL BUNK SONDEKOPPA CIRCLE NELAMANGALA 562 123 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.08.2016 PASSED IN MISC.NO.10016/2014 (LAC) ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, DODDABALLAPURA, ALLOWING THE MISC.PETITION FILED UNDER SEC. 3-H(4) OF NH ACT 1956.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37080-DB RFA No. 1372 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K) We have heard the learned counsel for the appellants.
2. Till today, office objection is not complied with. Therefore, in view of the peremptory order dated 19.09.2024 passed by this Court, no further order is required.
3. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV List No.: 4 Sl No.: 17