[2025:RJ-JP:7369-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1895/2025 Dr. Brajraj Singh Parmar S/o Keshav Singh, Aged About 66 Years, R/o H. No. 40-A, Shivpuri B, Jaipur, Jhotwara, Rajasthan- 302012. Through His Wife Kunjlata W/o Brajraj Singh Parmar Aged About 60 Years, R/o H. No. 40-A, Shivpuri B, Jaipur, Jhotwara, Rajasthan- 302012 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Department Of Ayurved, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Department Of Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikita, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. The Director Pension Department, Rajasthan Government, Jyoti Nagar Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhuvnesh Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 18/02/2025 1. After the order was passed by this Court earlier on 20.09.2024 in another petition, new developments have been brought to the notice of this Court, one of them regarding dismissal of the Review Petition by the Hon’ble Supreme Court filed in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma on 15.10.2024, as stated at the bar by learned counsel for the petitioners. [2025:RJ-JP:7369-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-1895/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also placed before this Court order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of The State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Pyare Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal © No.10560/2024), wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has clarified that there is no stay on the judgment of the High Court and further that in the event the outstanding towards salary has not been paid, the same shall be cleared within a period of one week. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that in the present case, the petitioners have retired and crossed the age of 62 years as on date. 3. In view of the above developments, we need not keep this petition pending and same is also finally disposed off in terms of order passed earlier by this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. And other connected matters (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13496/2021), decided on 13.07.2022. As the petitioners have retired and crossed the age of 62 years, they shall be deemed to have continued in service upto 62 years. This will require the respondents-authority to pass necessary orders treating them in service till attaining the age of 62 years in individual cases with consequential benefits of continuity of service. All other consequential action would also be required to be taken which include refixation of pension and other benefits. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J DEEPA RANI -59