Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56794 (KAR)

SRI THAMMAIAH v. SRI T S NARAYANA MURTHY

RSA/1317/2009 · 2025-11-21

M G Uma

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48189 RSA No. 1317 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1317 OF 2009 (DEC) BETWEEN: SRI THAMMAIAH. S/O PATEL HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT TUBINAKATTE VILLAGE, SARAVANAHALLI POST, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. U. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: SRI T.S. NARAYANA MURTHY, S/O SRIRANGACHAR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT TUBINAKATTE VILLAGE SARAVANAHALLI POST, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 227 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.N. MADHUSUDHAN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD:17.6.2009 PASSED IN R.A.NO.276/2006 ON THE FILE THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) & JMFC., TURUVEKERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 8.12.2003 PASSED IN O.S.NO.93/1997 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) & JMFC., TURUVEKERE. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48189 RSA No. 1317 of 2009 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant and respondent are absent. The order sheet dated 07.11.2025 reads as under: "None appears for the appellant and the respondent. The appeal is of the year 2009. The matter is listed in advanced list and concerned advocates are requested not to seek adjournment and to address their arguments on merits. Inspite of that, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and the respondent. It appears that the parties are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, list on 21.11.2025." In-spite of that, there is no representation. It appears that the parties are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE MKM CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5