Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-13529-2025 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-13529-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.05.2025 Tamanna Babbar
....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Present: Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
*** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to hand over the physical possession of the Institutional Property (Hospital & School site) No. PET, in Sector 45, Urban Estate, Gurugram II, after completition of development works/basic amenities.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already made representations dated 17.09.2024 and 24.04.2025 (Annexures P-3 and P-4) to the competent authorities, for redressal of her grievances, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the respondent authorities are
directed to deal with her concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representation(s).
AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.27 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-13529-2025 (O&M)
-2-
3.
Served with the advance copy of the petition, Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana, appears on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advocate, along with Ms. Ashna Singh, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3-HSVP. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submits that the said representations/applications shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law.
4.
Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3-Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram (competent authority) to look into the pending representations dated 17.09.2024 and 24.04.2025 (Annexures P-3 and P-4) and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE
(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 13.05.2025 Ajay Prasher
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.27 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document