NITIN S/O LAXMANRAO TIDKE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO LAKADGANJ NAGPUR AND ANOTHER
ABA/827/2024 · 2025-01-15
Urmila Joshi Phalke
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56788 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56788 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 43-ABA No.827.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO. 827 OF 2024 Nitin S/o. Laxmanrao Tidke ..VS.. State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Lakadganj, Nagpur and one another --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. R. A. Biranware, Advocate for applicant. Mr. V.A. Thakre, APP for non-applicant No.1/State. Ms. Neerja Chaubey, Advocate (appointed) for non-applicant No.2.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED : 15 th JANUARY, 2025
1. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail.
2. An Affidavit filed by victim is taken on record.
3. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant to some extent.
4. Perused the investigation papers as well as the Affidavit filed by the victim, I have shown my disinclination to grant bail, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application. Permission is granted.
5. The Criminal Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
6. Fees of the appointed Counsel for the non- applicant No.2 be quantified as per rule.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
Kirtak 2025:BHC-NAG:403