Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56786 (AP)

Behara Private ITI, v. The Director General of Employment & Training

WP/28875/2016 · 2025-10-07

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010608982016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 28875/2016 Between: 1. BEHARA PRIVATE ITI,, (SPONSORED BY VIJAY BEHARA WELFARE SOCIETY) NARAVA, WORD NO.57, GVMC. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN BEHARA BASKARA RAO, S!O.SANKARA NARAVANZI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT TRAINING, THE MINISTRYOF LABOUR& EMPLOYMENT. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA., NEW DELHI-1 10001.. 2. THE QUALITY CONTROL OF INDIA INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, BUILDING 2ND FLOOR, BAHADHURSHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI - 110002. 3. THE STATE OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING. AP. SECRETARIAT. HYDERABAD. 4. THE COMMISSIONER EMPLOYMENT TRAINING, BRK BHAVAN. A.P.. HYDERABAD. 5. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR, EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, GOVERNMENT GIRLS ITI. KANCHARAPALLEM. VISAKHAPATNAM. A.P. 6. THE CONVENOR, GOVERNMENT GIRLS ITL, OLD VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ. Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondents is not issuing the Affiliation to the petitioner institution for the academic year 2016-2017 even though the 3rd respondent issued G.O.Ms.No.15 dated 31-3-2016 as being improver. unjust. and violation of the Rules and Consequently direct the 1st respondents to issue Affiliation and permit the petitioner Institution in the 3rd Phase 2 Counseling List to be held on 31-8-2016 for the academic year 2016- 2017 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 35744 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to implead the petitioner institution in the 3rd phase counseling list to be held on 31.08.2016 for the academic year 2016-2017, pending disposal of main writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2016(WPMP 155867 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y ANUPAMA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAINING (AP) 2. A KRANTI KUMAR REDDY The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 8th October, 2025 cbn 4 206 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.28875 of 2016 8th October, 2025 cbn