1 2025:CGHC:58295 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6247 of 2025 1 - Rajesh S/o Late Shri Tejram Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Karmsen, Tahsil Navagarh, District - Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Budheshwar S/o Late Shri Tejram Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Karmsen, Tahsil Navagarh, District - Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - Shakuntala W/o Omprakash Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Karmsen, Tahsil Navagarh, District - Bemetara (C.G.) 4 - Hemlata W/o Dilip Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Karmsen, Tahsil Navagarh, District - Bemetara (C.G.) 5 - Dashoda W/o Late Shri Tejram Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Karmsen, Tahsil Navagarh, District - Bemetara (C.G.) ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Bemetara, District - Bemetara (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar Nandghat, District - Bemetara (C.G.) 4 - Patwari P.H. No. 05, Tahsil Nandghat District - Bemetara (C.G.) 5 - Sub Registrar Nandghat District - Bemetara (C.G. 2 6 - C.G. State Waqf Board Through Its Chairman, Infront Of Dr Bhimrao Ambedkar Statue, Collectorate Chowk, Civil Lines, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. R.S. Marhas, Additional Advocate General For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 02/12/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking for the following relief(s):- “10.1. The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for all the records pertaining to the case of the petitioners. 10.2 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to remove the properties of the petitioners from the list of Waqf Properties. 10.3 The Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioners to proceed with their sale proceedings. 10.4 Any other consequential relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper and for which the petitioners is entitled, may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 2. In view of the objection raised by the counsel for the respective respondents, with regard to the maintainability of this writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition as this stage, with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum. 3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY