1 2025:CGHC:61446 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6583 of 2025 1 - Bank Of India Through- Authorised Officer, Shri Suraj Kumar, S/o Shri Kamlesh Prasad Aged About- 40 Years, Office At- ARB- Bank Of India, Naya Raipur,district- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Atal Nagar, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Cum-District- Magistrate Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 3 - The Tehsildar Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 5 - The Sub Divisional Magistrate Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 6 - M/s Bhawana Consultancy And Travels Through- Proprietor Pankaj Kumar Singh, Office At Mopka Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondent No.1 to 5 : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 17/12/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits petitioner is secured creditor, filed an application U/s. 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The District Magistrate, Bilaspur has passed an order directing the BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.12.19 10:30:37 +0530 2 Tahsildar-cum-Executive Magistrate to take possession of the secured assets and to hand it over to petitioner, secured creditor. The order of the District Magistrate is dated 06.06.2024, however, even after lapse of more than one and half years, possession of property as ordered by the District Magistrate is not taken and handed over to petitioner by respondent No.3, therefore, a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to conclude the proceedings pursuant to the order passed by the District Magistrate within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that he is having no objection on the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner.. 3. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for parties and also considering the order (Annexure P-1), this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to comply with the order passed by the District Magistrate (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if there is no other impediment. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram