APHC010265392012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 642/2012 Between: 1. ALLADI SAMBRAJYAM & ANOTHER, W/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA, CULTIVATION, R/O. GORANTLA VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. ALLADI AUDI LAKSHMI,, W/O. LATE SURYANARAYANA, CULTIVATION, R/O. GORANTLA VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. SRI MALLESWRA SWAMI TEMPLE ANOTHER, GORANTAL VILLAGE, GUNTUR RURAL MANDAL, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, OPP: GUNTAKA GROUND, GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto set aside the order NO. 76 dt. 25-08-2009 in OA NO. 41 of 1996 on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Guntur, by allowing the present appeal with costs throughout, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 791 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 519 days in filing the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the order of deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department in Order NO. 76 dt. 25-08-2009 in OA NO. 76 dt. 25-08-2009 in OA NO. 41/96 and to pass 2 IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 854 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the order and all further proceedings in order No. 76, dated 25.08.2009 of the Deputy Commissioner of Endowment, Guntur in OA.No. 41/1996 pending disposal of the Civil Miscellaneous Petition, otherwise we will be put to great loss and hardship IA NO: 3 OF 2011(CMAMP 1175 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify the interim order passed in CMAMP.No. 854/2011 in CMA(SR).No. 15572/2011, dated 29.04.2011 with a reasonable lease amount payable by the petitioner by exending the stay order until further orders IA NO: 4 OF 2011(CMAMP 1363 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time for complying with the conditions stipulated in the order Dated 29.04.2011 in CMAMP.No. 854/2011 fo two weeks from the date of order on the present petition IA NO: 5 OF 2011(CMAMP 1364 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to obstruct and prevent the petitioner from cultivating the Agricultural land, subject matter of the main appeal in CMASR.No. 15572/2011 until further orders IA NO: 6 OF 2011(CMAMP 1394 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to restore the possession of my agricultural land situated in D.No.475 of Gorantla Village, Guntur Rural Mandal, to an extent of Ac.4.34 cents belonging to the respondents Temple IA NO: 7 OF 2011(CMAMP 1395 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to not to alienate of my agricultural 3 land situated in D.No.475 of Gorantla Village, Guntur Rural Mandal, to an extent of Ac.4.34 cents belonging to the respondents Temple in any manner including the proposed auction of lease hold rights on 02.08.2011 Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. PRABHAKAR RAICHUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. V T M PRASAD 3. . The Court made the following: 4 JUDGMENT: Despite the matter being listed today i.e., on 25.09.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the appellants. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 04.09.2025, 31.07.2025, and 11.07.2025, there was no representation for the appellants. 2. Therefore, it appears that the appellants have no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 25th September, 2025 cbn 5 234 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CMA No.642 of 2012 25th September, 2025 cbn