SHAIK ABDUL HAI v. CHAIRMAN RAYALASEEMA GRAMEENA BANK
WP/18753/2002 · 2025-12-03
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56768 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56768 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010427932002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18753 of 2002 Bench Sr.No:-21 [3506]
Shaik Abdul Hai and Others ...Petitioner(s) Vs. Chairman Rayalaseema Grameena Bank and Others ...Respondent(s)
********** Advocate for Petitioners:
Sri M V RAJA RAAM Advocate for Respondents:
Smt.V UMA DEVI
CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 4th December 2025
ORDER:
On 13.11.2025, as there was no representation for the petitioners, the writ petition was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal” on 20.11.2025. On 20.11.2025 and on 27.11.2025, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, it was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
2. Smt.V.Umadevi, learned counsel for the respondents, is present.
2
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:04.12.2025. cs