Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56767 (AP)

Gaddala Ramakrishna, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21612/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010356292021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21612/2021 Between: 1. GADDALA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O.RAMACHANDRA RAO AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.3-81, TATAKUNTLA VILLGAE, VISSANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RESERVE POLICE QUARTERS, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, VISSANNAPETA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, VISANNAPETA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 7. MALLADI MUKKAIAH, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O.TATAKUNTLA VILLGAE, VISSANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA 8. MALLADI SIVA, S/O. MALLADI MUKKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. TATAKUNTLA VILLGAE, VISSANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 9. MALLADI CHITTAIAH, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. TATAKUNTLA VILLAGE, VISSANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. 10. MALLADI SAI KUMAR, S/O. MALLADI CHITTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O.TATAKUNTLA VILLAGE, VISSANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to take stringent action against the unofficial respondents who are obstructing the Petitioner from exercising his right to cultivate his land by registering a case and taking necessary action on the report by the Petitioner dated 25.06.2021 and also order not to interfere with property of the Petitioner for an extent of Ac.4.24 cents in Survey No.48/2, 48/5 of Tatakuntla Village, Visannapeta Mandal, Krishna District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to register a case against the unofficial respondents based on the report given by the Petitioner dated 25.06.2021 until disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. B ASHOK KUMAR 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the Petitioner seeking the following relief: “.... to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to take stringent action against the unofficial respondents who are obstructing the Petitioner from exercising his right to cultivate his land by registering a case and taking necessary action on the report by the Petitioner dated 25.06.2021 and also order not to interfere with property of the Petitioner for an extent of Ac.4.24 cents in Survey No.48/2, 48/5 of Tatakuntla Village, Visannapeta Mandal, Krishna District and pass ...” None represented for the Petitioner. At the time of hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that respondent Police did not receive any complaint from the Petitioner and would submit that necessary orders may be passed by disposing of this Writ Petition. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 21612 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*