Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56766 (KAR)

SRI .C. MALLESHA v. SMT. USHA

WP/19264/2021 · 2025-07-15

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26055 WP No. 19264 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19264 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI .C. MALLESHA, AGED 63 YEARS, S/O CHANNABASAPPA R/AT KONSASUR VILLAGE AND POST BETTADAPURA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TQ, MYSURU DISTRICT 571102 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PUNDIKAI ISHWARA BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. USHA D/O LATE K CHANNABASAPPA AND W/O LATE H D CHIKKAVERRAPPA R/AT R RAMCHANDRA, DOOR NO 9/28 SAPTHAGIRI SMB COLONY, ARVINDANAGARA, MYSUR CITY - 570 008. 2. BHARATHI AGED 48 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO 721/2 MANCHEGOWDANAKOPPALUR KATTEHOUSRU POST, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT - 561 716. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26055 WP No. 19264 of 2021 3. SMT K M SULIKHA AGED 53 YEARS W/O M M BASHEER R/AT DOOR NO 310/4, 4TH BLOCK RADHAKRISHNA EXTN KUSHALNAGAR TOWN SOMWARPETE TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 234. 4. SRI. SWAMYNAYAKA AGED 63 YEARS S/O LATE THAMMANAYAKA 5. SRI. HANUMANTHANAYAKA AGED 32 YEARS S/O LATE SWAMYNAYAKA 6. SRI. SUNDARESHA AGED 30 YEARS S/O LATE SWAMYNAYAKA NO.4 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT CHARAPURA VILLAGE, POONDAHALLI POST, HARNAHALLI HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107. 7. SRI. M.M. SHIVARAJASHETTY AGED 73 YEARS S/O LT APPAJISHETTY 8. SRI. M.S. RAMESHA AGED 48 YEARS S/O SHIVARAJASHETTY NO.7 AND 8 ARE RESIDING AT - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26055 WP No. 19264 of 2021 MAYIGOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE CHUNCHANAKATTE HOBLI K.R. NAGARA TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 617. 9. SRI. K.C. LOKESHA AGED 65 YEARS S/O LT CHANNABASAPA 10. SRI. K.C. SHASHISHEKHARA AGED 53 YEARS S/O LATE CHANNABASAPPA NO.9 AND 10 ARE RESIDING AT KONSUR VILLAGE AND POST BETTDAPURA HOBLI, PERIYAPATNA TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 102. …RESPONDENTS (R1 - SERVED - UNREPRESENTED; VIDE ORDER DATED 08.11.2021, NOTICE TO R3 TO R10 IS WAIVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 22.08.2023, NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 5.10.2021 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT PEIRYAPTNA ON IA NO.11 IN O.S.NO.70/0013 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26055 WP No. 19264 of 2021 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed. Accordingly, appropriate orders may be passed, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 CT: BHK