Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010478062025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24288/2025 Between:
1. DUKKA NARAYUDU, S/O. LATE ASIRAYYA, AGED 47 YRS, R/O. GOLLA MENTADA VILLAGE,
RANASTHALAM MANDAL. SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. DUKKA MANGAMMA, W/O. SURAPPADU, AGED 55 YRS R/O. GOLLA MENTADA VILLAGE,
RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
HOME DEPARTMENT,
A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RANASTHALAM POLICE STATION SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SI OF POLICE, RANASTHALAM POLICE STATION SRIKAKULAM DISTRCT. 5. DUKKA SANYASI, S/O. LATE ASIRAYYA, AGED 50 YRS, R/O. GOLLAMENTADA VILLAGE,
RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 4 in interfering in civil disputes relating to the property pending between the petitioner and the respondent in O.S. No. 482 of 2023 and O.S. No. 127 of 2025 on the file of Principal Junior Civil judges Court at Srikakulam and O.S. No. 58 of 2025 on the file of IV AddI District Judges Court at Srikakulam and keeping the Bolero motor vehicle bearing No. AP 39 WC 7810 at police station without recourse to law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under constitution of india consequently directing the respondents to not to interfere in the said civil disputes property and also issues by further directing the respondents 3 4 to return the said Bolero vehicle forthwith to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No.3 & 4 to return the Bolero vehicle bearing No. AP 39 WC 7810 to the petitioner forthwith and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased petition, the petitioner herein pray to direct property in O.S. No. 482 of 2023 on the fiie of Principal Junior Civii judges Srikakuiam and O.S. No. 58 of 2025 on the fiie of IV Addi District such other order or orders the respondents No.3 & 4 not to interfere in the civil disputes Court at Judges Court at Srikakulam and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.
T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 & 4 in interfering in civil disputes relating to the property pending between the petitioner and the respondent in O.S.No.482 of 2023 and O.S.No.127 of 2025 on the file of Principal Junior Civil judges Court at Srikakulam and O.S.No.58 of 2025 on the file of IV AddI District Judges Court at Srikakulam and keeping the Bolero motor vehicle bearing No.AP 39 WC 7810 at police station without recourse to law as illegal arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and also in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India consequently directing the respondents to not to interfere in the said civil disputes property and also issues by further directing the respondents 3 & 4 to return the said Bolero vehicle forthwith to the petitioner…”
2. Heard Sri T.V.S.Prabhakar Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in the light of the submission made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home that the Police are not interfering in the civil dispute between the parties and that they have not seized the vehicle of the petitioner, recording the same petition may be disposed of.
4. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.09.2025 JLV
549
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.24288 of 2025
Dated: 22.09.2025
JLV