- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44699 WP No. 23240 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 23240 OF 2022 (GM-FOR) BETWEEN: SMT.LAKSHMIDEVAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O LATE CHANDREGOWDA R/A BILEKALLAHALLI VILLAGE UDDEBORANAHALLI POST CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMARA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY FOREST DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 01. 3. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST CHIKKAMAGALURU DIVISION CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 101. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTIRCT - 577 101. 5. THE THAHSILDAR CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK - 577 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA) Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44699 WP No. 23240 of 2022 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION VIDE ANNEXURE-H DATED 01.07.2022 AND DIRECTION MAY BE ISSUED FOR RESTORATION OF DISPOSSESSED LAND IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER BY DE-FENCING THE SUBJECT LAND IN RESPECT OF 4 ACRE AND 20 GUNTAS LAND IN SURVEY NO.77 OF GUNGARAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKYA HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has sought for writ of mandamus against the respondents to consider the representation dated 01.07.2022 (Annexure-H) to the writ petition. 3. Perusal of the writ petition would indicate that petitioner is required to produce the relevant documents to establish that he is having right over the property in question and unauthorized occupation of the land in question by the petitioner for regularization. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44699 WP No. 23240 of 2022 4. In that view of the matter since the petitioner has not produced the relevant document to establish his right over the property in question, I am of the view that, writ petition does not survive for consideration. 5. However, it is open for the petitioner to establish his right over the property in question in a manner known to law. With this observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43