Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5676 (JHR)

PRADEEP DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2043/2025 · 2025-07-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:19547 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2043 of 2025 ------ Pradeep Das, aged about 25 years, son of Tilak Mahra, resident of Village-Gobarsala, P.O.-Babangama, P.S.-Sarath (Patharda O.P.), Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 17.07.2025 I.A. No. 7770 of 2025 Heard the parties. This interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of this bail application. Since, hearing of this bail application is taken up today, this interlocutory application is disposed of being infructuous. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No. 2043 of 2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.136 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 319(2)/ 318(4)/ 338/ 336(3)/ 340(2)/ 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66B/66C/66D & 84 C of I.T. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and he has defrauded the victim Vimal Kumar to the tune of Rs.5,000/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that one mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 21.12.2024 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to transfer Rs.5,000/- to the Bank Account of Vimal Kumar without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transfer of Rs.5,000/- to the Bank Account of Vimal Kumar without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.136 of 2024 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/