HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. VIS. v. M/S. SRI SRINIVASA AGENCIES, E.G. DISTRICT
WA/25/2010 · 2025-08-04
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5675 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5675 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
aN APHC010049362010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE w- ofl OA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 25 OF 2010 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dt. 04-12-2009 in WP No. 23249 of 2008 on the file of the High Court. Between: Hindustan petroleum corporation ltd. Visakha Regional Office, "Petro Nilayam Post Box No. 135, Visakhapatnam, rep.by its Chief Regional Manager-Retail ...Appellant/Respondent AND M/s Sri Srinivasa Agencies, HP Dealer, NH 5 Road, Dharmavaram, Prathipadu Mandal, East Godavari District rep.by its proprietor Mr.R.Veera Babu S/o.Sri Bhima Chakram, aged about 36 years ...Respondent/Writ Petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2010(WAMP 81 OF 20101 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order dated 04-12-2009 in WP No. 23249 of 2006 pending writ appeal.
miwr Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M RAVINDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI G VIDYASAGAR The Court made the following order:
% APHC010049362010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Bench Sr.No:-48 AT AMARAVATI [3483] WRIT APPEAL NO: 25 of 2010 Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...Appellant Vs. M/s. Sri Srinivasa Agencies ...Respondent Advocate for Appellant Advocate for Respondent
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 5th August 2025 PC : Repeated adjournments have been sought in the matter. It appears that the appellant is not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. Even today, an adjournment is sought, which is declined. This Writ Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
2.
3. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.S.V. NAVEEN CHANDRA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri M Ravindranath Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri G Vidyasagar, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies
2.
3. TF
HIGH COURT DATED:05/08/2025
ORDER WA NO. 25 OF 2010 X 2 n AUG 2075 m 09 \<3. ^ . Current Section DISMISSING THE W.A. FOR NON PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS