Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:61888
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2079 of 2024 1 - Garibdas S/o Late Ummen Das Aged About 42 Years Caste Panika, Resident Of Village Bhathagaon P.S. And Up Tahsil Kosir, District Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.),...(Complainant) 2 - Raju Das S/o Late Khikdas Aged About 30 Years Caste - Panika, Resident Of Village Sangitarai, Raigarh Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Anju D/o Late Khikdas, W/o Santosh Aged About 28 Years Caste - Panika, Resident Of Village Sangitarai, Raigarh Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Champa D/o Late Ummendas, W/o Late Mahendra Aged About 41 Years Caste Panika, Resident Of Village Suwatal, P.S. And Tahsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 5 - Smt. Vimla D/o Late Ummen Das, W/o Ramprasad Aged About 40 Years Caste - Panika, Resident Of Village Ujhara, P.S. And Tahsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Urmila D/o Late Ummen Das, W/o Laxman Das Aged About 38 Years Caste - Panika, Resident Of Village Gudeli, P.S. And Tahsil Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.), (The Said Appellants Are Legal Successor Of The Deceased Late Ummen Das Who Is Died On 24-06-2013 As Per Death Certificate And Hence Late Ummen Das Is Not Made Party As Per Order Dated 10-01-2024 Of The Learned Court Below) SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Digitally signed by SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Date: 2025.12.19 16:55:06 +0530
2
... Petitioner(s) versus Nandram Lahre S/o Charan Das Lahre Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Village Bhathagaon Taluka, Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.),... (Accused)
---- Respondent (The cause-title is taken from CIS) For Petitioners
: None For Respondent
: None Hon'ble Shri Justice
Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Order On Board 19/12/2025
1. On 02.12.2025, none appeared on behalf of the Petitioners when the matter has been called twice. Today also, no representation made on behalf of the Petitioners even when the matter is called in second round. This Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.
2. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Shubham