SANDESH S/O GANGADHAR KHADSE v. PRASHIK ANANDRAO KHANDARE AND OTHERS
CAF/3771/2024 · 2025-01-14
Shri Sandipkumar Chandrabhan More
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56745 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56745 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 26.fa.501.2019 IN THE HIGH
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3771 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.501 OF 2019 Sandesh s/o Gangadhar Khadse ..vs.. Prashik Anandrao Khandare and ors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.S. Shingane, Advocate for the appellant.
CORAM: SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 14/01/2025. Heard
learned
Counsel
for
the appellant/applicant-Claimant.
2. The application is filed for service upon respondent nos.1 and 2, who are the Driver and Owner of the offending vehicle by way of paper publication, since they could not be found on last known address.
3. The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that they were served on the same address in the Tribunal.
4. As such, the application stands allowed and the appellant is permitted to serve the respondent nos.1 and 2 by way of paper publication as claimed, on deposit of necessary charges directly to the concerned Newspaper.
5. The application is disposed of.
6. Stand over to 18.02.2025.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
, J. ) Trupti