Dasari Pratap Naidu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/4278/2024 · 2025-12-08
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56745 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56745 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010076272024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4278/2024 Between:
1. DASARI PRATAP NAIDU,, S/O. DASARI GOVINDAPPA, AGED 40, R/O. D.NO. 2-818, B.C. COLONY, HANCHANAHAL VILLAGE, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTIONS OF A P, SRI SUJANA BHAVAN, BRTS ROAD,
BAVAJIPET, DURGAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 3. SRI C ADISESHA REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN,AGEDNOT KNOWN. ADVOCATE/SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, R/O. 11-1-413, ARAVINDA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. VADDEMALYAM VENKATALAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATESULU, AGED NOT KNOWN, R/O. RAM NAGAR, URAVAKONDA TOWN, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring G.O.RT.No. 1033 dated 08-11-2022
respondent. Government, entrusting the conduct ofissued by the 1 St prosecution of Sessions Case No. 118/2019 on the file of the Vll Addl. District and Sessions Judge - cum - Family Court, Ananthapuramu to the 3rd respondent as the same is contrary to law, arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction and consequently enable the regular prosecutor to conduct prosecution of Sessions Case No. 118/2019 on the file of the Vll Addl. District and Sessions Judge - cum - Family Court, Ananthapuramu, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend G.O.RT.No. 1033 dated 08-11- 2022 issued by the 1®^ respondent. Government, issued by the l®t respondent enabling the regular public prosecutor, to conduct prosecution of Sessions Case No. 118/2019 on the file of the VII Addl.
District and Sessions Judge - cum - Family Court, Ananthapuramu, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Sessions Case No. 118/2019 on the file oi the VII Addl. District and Sessions Judge - cum - Family Court, Ananthapuramu, pending disposal of the writ petition, and to pas Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. NALLURI SAHITHI APARNA
3. SODUM ANVESHA The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4278 of 2024 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring G.O.RT.No. 1033 dated 08-11-2022 respondent. Government, entrusting the conduct ofissued by the 1 St prosecution of Sessions Case No. 118/2019 on the file of the Vll Addl. District and Sessions Judge - cum - Family Court, Ananthapuramu to the 3rd respondent as the same is contrary to law, arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and without jurisdiction and consequently enable the regular prosecutor to conduct prosecution of Sessions Case No. 118/2019 on the file of the Vll Addl. District and Sessions Judge - cum - Family Court, Ananthapuramu, and to pass.…”
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.4278 of 2024
Dated.09.12.2025
TVN
67