1 2025:CGHC:58528 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6279 of 2025 1 - Smt. Sumitra Verma W/o Ram Narayan Verma Aged About 37 Years R/o Village- Basin (Thelki) Janpad Panchayat Pathariya District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh, ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (14th Financial Year) Indravati Bhawan Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector Cum District- Programme Coordinator (14th Financial Years ) Mungeli District- Mungeli (C.G.) 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mungeli District- Mungeli (C.G.) 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpand Panchayat Pathariya District- Mungeli (C.G.) 6 - Executive Engineer Rural Engeneering Services Mungeli, District- Mungeli (C.G.) 7 - Gram Panchayat Basin Through Its Secretary Basin District- Mungeli (C.G.) 8 - Sarpanch Graam Panchayat Basin, District- Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Anurag Tripathi, Panel Lawyer 2 SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 03/12/2025 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):- “10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned order dated 20.09.2024 (Annexure P/1) passed by Respondent No. 5 and call the records of the case from the respondents for its kind consideration of the Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/directions commanding the respondent authorities to immediately release/dirburse the balance amount within stipulated time along with appropriate interest for the two works carried out in Gram Panchayat Basin under the funds sanctioned from 14th Financial Year (Gram Panchayat Mission). 10.3 That, Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/order which may deem fit and appropriate.” 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to avail the other alternate remedy available to her under the law for redressal of her grievance. 3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY