APHC010056072018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 199/2018 Between: 1. POLAKI TIRUPATHI RAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. POLAKI MANMADHA RAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. POLAKI TIRUPATHI RAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. MADAPALA SHANMUKHARAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. POLAKI PEDDASAVARAYYA, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. POLAKI KRISHNARAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 7. MADAPALA MOHANARAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. VAJJA PAPINAIDU, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. POLAKI DHARMA RAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. VIDYABHUSHANA MADANA MOHANA MISRA, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 11. VADAVALASA UTTARARAO, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 12. MADAPALA RAMU, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 13. MADAPALA CHIRANJEEVULU, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 14. POLAKI POLISU, R/O DEENABANDHUPURAM VILLAGE, NANDIGAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT 3 Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of Grounds in Criminal Revision Case against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 384 of 2015 in P.R.C.No. 12 of 2013 dated 17-08-2017 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of the 1st Class, Tekkali, Srikakulam District. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of 60 days in filing the Revision, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in P.R.C.No. 12 of 2013 dated 17-08-2017 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of the 1st Class, Tekkali, Srikakulam District., pending disposal of the main Crl.R.C., and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. A RAVI SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 4 O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioners/accused under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Order dated 17.08.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.384 of 2015 in P.R.C.No.12 of 2013 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Tekkali, Srikakulam District, (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order dated 17.08.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.384 of 2015 in P.R.C.No.12 of 2013. The Crl.M.P.No.384 of 2015 has been filed by the petitioners/accused seeking to discharge them from the case. By impugned order dated 17.08.2017, the trial Court dismissed the petition by recording certain reasons. Against the said order, the petitioners herein preferred the revision. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main P.R.C.No.12 of 2013 was disposed on 18.05.2022. In support of this, a copy from the e-Courts website has been filed, which reflects that the said P.R.C.No.12 of 2013 was disposed on contest on 18.05.2022 and ended in acquittal. 5. Recording the said submission of learned Assistant Public Prosecutor and in view of the disposal of the P.R.C.No.12 of 2013 on 18.05.2022, this Court finds the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 5 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 24.11.2025 ANS 6 205 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 199/2018 Date: 24.11.2025 ANS