Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56736 (PNJ)

PUSHPINDER KAUR ALIAS SONI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER

CRM-M/27224/2025 · 2025-05-19

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-27224-2025 DECIDED ON: 19.05.2025 PUSHPINDER KAUR ALIAS SONI .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Imraan Farooqi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG Punjab. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 528 BNSS for directing the respondents No.2 & 3 to conduct a fair, impartial, and time-bound inquiry into the petitioner’s representation (Annexure P-2) asserting false implication in FIR No.30 dated 02.03.2025 registered under Sections 117(2), 115(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station City-1, Sangrur (Annexure P-1). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P-2), within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur to look into the representation dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) and decide the same in accordance with law after providing MEENU 2025.05.19 20:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-27224-2025 -2- opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or by passing a speaking order within a period of six weeks from today. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 19.05.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.05.19 20:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document