132 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-29084-2024 Date of decision: 02.05.2025 SUBHASH CHAND ARORA ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Neeraj Sansaniwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana. ..… SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has been arrested in the case. 2. In view of the statement, instant petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (SANJIV BERRY) 02.05.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.05.05 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment