Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No. 372 of 2022 Ranjan Kumar Mohapatra ..... Appellant Mr. S. Swain, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 27.03.2025 Order No.06 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Perused the tracking report. Since notice has been duly served on Respondent No. 3, notice against the said Respondent is treated as sufficient. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court so passed on 19.03.2025 in FAO No. 509 of 2014 and batch. 5. In view of such submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties, the present FAO is disposed of in the light of the judgment so passed in FAO No. 509 of 2014 and batch. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha