Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56733 (KAR)

MRS BASAMMA v. M/S RECLUSE RESORTS

CRP/451/2022 · 2025-11-11

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46364 CRP No. 451 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 451 OF 2022 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. MRS BASAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS W/O LATE GURULINGAIAH, 2. SURESH B B AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O LATE GURULINGAIAH, 3. HARISH B G AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O LATE GURULINGAIAH, 4. YATHIS B G AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS S/O LATE GURULINGAIAH, ALL ARE R/AT BOLLUR VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI, SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 234 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. G BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46364 CRP No. 451 of 2022 AND: 1. M/S RECLUSE RESORTS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM BY ITS PARTNER, MR. BADARUDDHEN MR. BADARUDHEEN K P AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE GULAM MOHIYUDHEEN HAJI R/AT ZAIDU MANZIL KAILU PARAMBAN ROAD, CHEMNAD TIRUANGADI MALLAPURAM DISTRICT KERALA STATE 676 121 2. SANTHOSH B G S/O LATE GURULINGAIAH, R.AT BOLLUR VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI, SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571 234 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NANDISH GOWDA G.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 18.07.2023, NOTICE TO R2 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC. AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 27.06.2022 PASSED IN OS.NO.49/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SOMWARPET, PARTLY ALLOWING THE I.A. FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46364 CRP No. 451 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under: "The petitioners most respectfully submit that since the parties to the above CRP have settled the matter among themselves, the above revision petition may be dismissed as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity. Placing the memo on record, civil revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30 CT-SG