Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010175242021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 827 of Between:
1. KONDAGORRI KANCHAMMA, W/O.LATE THAVITAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 6 SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. KONDAGORRI GOPALA RAO, S/O LATE THAVITAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, R/O D.NO. 6-9, MAIN VEEDHI, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 1. CH.SRIDHAR, I.A.S, PROJECT OFFICER, I.T.D.A, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. RAKOTI RAMESH KUMAR, THE TAHASILDAR, SEETHAMPE MANDAL, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. Mr.HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. Mr.P. SUBASH
2. Mr.BOBBA HARI PRASAD REDDY 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 827 of 2021 KONDAGORRI KANCHAMMA, W/O.LATE THAVITAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 6-9, MAIN VEEDHI, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. KONDAGORRI GOPALA RAO, S/O LATE THAVITAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, 9, MAIN VEEDHI, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND CH.SRIDHAR, I.A.S, PROJECT OFFICER, I.T.D.A, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. RAKOTI RAMESH KUMAR, THE TAHASILDAR, SEETHAMPE MANDAL, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Mr.HARINADH NIDAMANURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
Mr.BOBBA HARI PRASAD REDDY IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3209] THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA KONDAGORRI KANCHAMMA, W/O.LATE THAVITAIAH, 9, MAIN VEEDHI, KONDAGORRI GOPALA RAO, S/O LATE THAVITAIAH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, (MGNREGS), 9, MAIN VEEDHI, SEETHAMPETA, SRIKAKULAM ...PETITIONER(S) CH.SRIDHAR, I.A.S, PROJECT OFFICER, I.T.D.A, SEETHAMPETA, RAKOTI RAMESH KUMAR, THE TAHASILDAR, SEETHAMPETA ...CONTEMNOR(S):
2
The Court made the following Order:
The Contempt Case is filed alleging violation of the orders dated 15.03.2021 in Writ Petition No.5734 of 2021, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:
“Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and perusing the communication dated 20.01.2021 of the third respondent directing submission of a report with regard to the petitioner’s representation dated 04.01.2021, there shall be interim direction to the respondents as prayed for till a report is submitted and further action is taken thereon.”
At the time of considering the matter, Mr.S.Satish, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 2nd respondent had drawn the attention of this Court to the specific averment made in the counter-affidavit (para No.2), wherein it is inter alia stated that the Tahsildar, Seethampeta in Rc.No.28/2021 A dated 15.02.2021 submitted a report to the District Collector, Srikakulam and a copy of the same was also marked to the petitioner. The said report dated 15.02.2021 is filed along with the counter-affidavit. In the light of the counter averments, to which no reply / rejoinder is filed, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date: 13.11.2025 BLV
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
C.C.No.827 of 2021 Dt: 13.11.2025
BLV