SALMA BATT v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH. SECRETARY YOUTH SERVICES AND SPORTS DEPTT. AND OTHERS.
WP(C)/4176/2019 · 2025-03-18
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5672 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5672 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 4176/2019
Salma Batt
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S. M. Wajahat, Advocate
vs
U. T. of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, DyAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 18.03.2025
1. On the previous date of hearing, when this matter was taken upconsideration, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the
judgment rendered by this Court in case titled “Sajjad Tariq Vs Union Territory of J&K and ors” (WP(C) No. 3276/2019) decided on 22.09.2022 and submitted that the fact in both the case are same and are jointly covered with certain law. He further prayed that this writ petition be also
disposed of in terms of the said judgment.
2. On the last date of hearing,Mr.Pawan Dev Singh, learned counsel for the respondents was providedcopy of the aforesaid judgment and he sought time to go through the same and report instructions. However, when asked today, whether the facts in both the cases are same, he fairly stillsubmitted to consider the same.
3. In view of the above, since the controversy involved in the instant petition is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment rendered by this Court, therefore, the instant petition shall stands disposed of in terms of the direction passed by this Court in Sajjad Tariq case (supra).
4. Disposed of in the above said terms.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
Jammu: 18.03.2025 Suraj 54