Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56718 (AP)

MIDDE SHANTHA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14160/2024 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010281832024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14160/2024 Between: MIDDE SHANTHA KUMARI, W/O GOPALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.25-4-3, 10TH WARD, SAMBUNIPET COLONY, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VEIAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSAPURAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PALAKOLLU TOWN POLICE STATION, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAKOLLU TOWN POLICE STATION, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. MIDDE DURGA NAGARAJESWARA RAO, S/O MIDDE SATYANARAYANA, AGED 38 YEARS, RIVATE EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.25-4-3, 10TH WARD, SAMBUNIPET COLONY, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. MIDDE MANI KUMARI, W/O DURGA NAGA RAJESWARA RAO, AGED 32 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF D.NO.25-4-3, 10TH WARD, SAMBUNIPET COLONY, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. MAMIDISETTI SANTHA, HUSBAND NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT 10TH WARD,SAMBUNIPET COLONY, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. DONGA REDDAIAH, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT 10TH WARD, SAMBUNIPET COLONY, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 10. MAMIDISETTI SATYANARAYANA, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THS PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDING AT 10TH WARD, SAMBUNIPET COLONY, PALAKOLLU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GOWRI SANKAR CHEEKATLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 29.5.2024 and not taking any action against the respondents 6 to 10 as, illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and also violation of principles of natural justice and also violation of Article 14, 19 and Art. 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 4th respondent to register the FIR basing on the complaint of the petitioner dt 29.5.2024 and take appropriate action against the respondents 6 to 10 in accordance with law.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by the Petitioner, a case in Crime No.199 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 448, 3549A and 506 read with 34 IPC has been registered. 3. Sri Ch.Gowri Shankar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.14160 of 2024 Dt.22.11.2025 Dinesh