CR-2938-2025 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2938-2025 Date of decision: 17.09.2025 Ashok Kapoor ...Pe!!oner Versus Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. There is no representa!on on behalf of the pe!!oner. 2. On 14.05.2025, the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel contends that application for mandatory injunction for issuance of electricity connection has been declined to him on the ground of lack of ownership. Learned counsel contends that since the premises is located in unauthorized colony, so there could not be any document of title. It is submitted that in compliance of sale circular No.SSC-33/2007, permitting release of electricity connection in unauthorized & slum areas, he had annexed the requisite documents but still relief has been declined. Counsel for the petitioner seeks time to produce the necessary documents in this regard, which were annexed by him to make compliance of the relevant sales circular. List on 08.07.2025.” 2. No such documents as referred in the order dated 14.05.2025 have been placed on record !ll date. 3. Nobody is appearing for the pe!!oner today. 4. It appears that pe!!oner is no longer interested in persuing the present revision pe!!on. 5. Dismissed in default for non-prosecu!on. 17.09.2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Yogesh Mehta 2025.09.17 15:45 I agree to specified portions of this document