M/S K K ENTERPRISES v. THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER CENTRAL
WP/29928/2025 · 2025-11-18
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56717 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56717 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47288 WP No. 29928 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 29928 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
M/S. K.K.ENTERPRISES, A REGISTERED PROPRIETORSHIP, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.34, CELLAR, JM ARCADE, ANNIPURA CROSS ROAD, 3RD STAGE,SUDHAMANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX SHRIDEVI SHAHSHIKUMAR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.RANGANATH R., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER (CENTRAL), BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, NR SQUARE, BENGALURU – 560 002.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ELECTION-CENTRAL) BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, NR SQUARE, BENGALURU – 560 002.
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47288 WP No. 29928 of 2025
3.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BBMP HEAD OFFICE, N.R. SQUARE.
4.
THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, NIRVACHAN SADAN, ASHOKA ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 001.
5.
THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER KARNATAKA NIRVACHANA NILAYA, SHESADRI ROAD, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. EMAIL: ceo_karnataka@eci.gov.in …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.L.SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI..R.DODWAD, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 12.05.2025, 10.07.2025 AND 06.09.2025 AT ANNEXURE E TO E2 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO MAKE PAYMENT OF THE PENDING BILLS AMOUNTING TO RS.9,33,562/- (RUPEES NINE LAKH THIRTY THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND SIXTY TWO RUPEES ONLY) IN THE 4 WORK ORDERS PASSED BY R2 DATED 12.04.2024, ANNEXURE – C TO C3 ALONG WITH AN INTEREST OF 18 PERCENT PER ANNUM FROM THE DATE IT IS DUE TILL THE DATE OF PAYMENTS,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47288 WP No. 29928 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs:
“a. Issue a writ of mandamus directing Respondent No. 1 to consider the representations dated 12.05.2025, 10.07.2025 and 06.09.2025 at Annexure E To E2 and direct the respondents to make payment of the pending bills amounting to Rs.9,33,562/- (Rupees Nine Lakh Thirty Three Thousand Five Hundred And Sixty Two Rupees Only) in the 4 work orders passed by R2 dated 12.04.2024, Annexure - C To C3 along with an interest of 18 percent per annum from the date it is due till the date of payments, b. Grant such other reliefs as may be found expedient in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the bills which had been submitted by the petitioner for the works carried out were not paid. As such, the petitioner has submitted representations on 12.05.2025, 10.07.2025 and 06.09.2025 at Annexures - E to E2 seeking for the said payments. Even the said representations not having been
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47288 WP No. 29928 of 2025
considered, the petitioner is before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs.
3. Whenever any bills and/or representation is submitted to the employer to make payment, it is required for the said employer to consider the said bills and either make payment or reject the request made within a reasonable period of time.
4. Needless to say, if an order of rejection is passed, the same is required to be accompanied by reasons. Neither having been done, I pass following:
ORDER [i] Writ Petition is allowed. [ii] A mandamus is issued directing respondent No.1 to consider the representations dated 12.05.2025, 10.07.2025, 06.09.2025 at Annexures - E to E2 and pass necessary orders within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47288 WP No. 29928 of 2025
[iii] It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner to the money spent.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9