Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26110 CRL.P No. 1162 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1162 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
MR SONU S/O MR VILSON AGED 20 YEARS R/AT NWC C/B 174 BEHIND SAIBABA TEMPLE NEW COLONY, BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT-577302
2.
MR. MANJU S/O LATE VENKATESHAN AGED 21 YEARS R/AT HOUSE NO 1, 68/A, VIDYAMANDIRA BHADRAVATHI TALUK SHIMOGGA DISTRICT-577302 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS C H, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY NEW TOWN POLICE STATION BHADRAVATHI, REP BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE 560001
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26110 CRL.P No. 1162 of 2023
2.
MR PRASAD W/O NARASIMHALAU AGED 31 YEARS RA/T NO 324, 3RD CROSS COOLIE BLOCK SHED, NEW TOWN BHADRAVATHI PRESENTLY R/AT 11, CORPORATION QUARTERS KADIRAYYANA PALYA, INDIRANGARA BANGALORE-560038 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKAT SATYANARAYAN.A, HCGP)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED IN C.C.NO.753/2020 (CR.NO.140/2019)BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT i.e NEW TOWN POLICE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 341,504,323,324,506 R/W 34 OF IPC AGAINST THE PETITIONERS WHO HAVE BEEN ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2, RESPECTIVELY, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, BHADRAVATHI, SHIVAMOGGA.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI
ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners.
2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session.
3. This matter is of the year 2023.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26110 CRL.P No. 1162 of 2023
4. Vide order dated 04.07.2025, a conditional
order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not complied with, necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition.
5. Despite the same, office objections are not complied with. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5