Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 56712 (BOM)
SANDEEP S/O VASANTRAO DESHKAR v. NIKHIL S/O VIJAY TAMBEKAR AND OTHERS
WP/688/2025 · 2025-02-07
Shri Anil L Pansare
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56712 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 56712 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 wp 688.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR. Writ Petition No. 688 of 2025 [Sandeep s/o Vasantrao Deshkar ..vs.. Nikhil s/o Vijay Tambekar and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. D. Dangore, Advocate for the petitioner CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.
DATED : 07-02-2025 After having heard for some time, when the Court was not inclined to grant relief, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission granted. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with clarification that merely because document is exhibited, that may not be treated as proof of contents of document. In fact, the trial Court has exhibited the document subject to proof of contents. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik 2025:BHC-NAG:1220