Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56705 (ALL)

VIPIN KUMAR v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUZAFFARNAGAR AND ANOTHER

WRIC/15328/2025 · 2025-05-14

Avnish Saxena, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80758-DB Court No. - 39 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15328 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vipin Kumar Respondent :- District Magistrate, Muzaffarnagar And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Tomar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Arindam Sinha,J. Hon'ble Avnish Saxena,J. 1. Mr.Virendra Singh Tomar, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, in property belonging to his client, respondent no.2 has issued licence in spite of status quo order passed by the civil Court. His client had made representation dated 30th April, 2025. He seeks direction upon said respondent to consider the representation. 2. Ms.Shreya Gupta, learned advocate appears and submits, her client wants to intervene in the writ petition. Her client is widowed sister-in-law of petitioner. The clinic was lastly run by her deceased husband and presently by a doctor and, accordingly, the registration was obtained. As such, her intervention application be allowed and her client be added as respondent no.3. 3. Mr.Tomar, in fairness, does not oppose the application. It is allowed. Applicant is added as respondent no.3. Petitioner has leave to cause the amendment in Court, to be countersigned by Court-Master. Ms.Gupta already has copy of the writ petition. 4. Mr.Raj Mohan Upadhyay, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State. 5. We are not inclined to direct issuance of notice on respondent no.2. Instead, said respondent is directed to consider petitioner's application dated 30th April, 2025. Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order and the representation to said respondent. For purpose of consideration, said respondent will require assistance from petitioner and added respondent no.3. 6. Our impression is, said respondent will be able to resolve the dispute regarding issuance of the licence and all matters incidental thereto. 7. The writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 LN Tripathi (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad