Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56702 (AP)

Tatineni Leelakrishna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/27702/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010459082021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 27702/2021 Between: 1. TATINENI LEELAKRISHNA, S/O.TATINENI KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, OCC-JOURNALIST, R/O.H.NO.2-8, MOVVA VILLAGE, MOVVA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 521135 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, 1ST BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, INTERIM GOVERNMENT COMPLEX, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHALLAPALLI POLICE STATION, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, 5TH TRAFFIC POLICE STATION, K S VYAS COMPLEX, NEAR A R POLICE GROUND, MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents (I)to provide video evidence of the charge of driving without a valid license alleged in the challan Challan Id AP2008071983005 issued to the petitioner on 07.08.2020. (II)to provide evidence of presence of an officer of the rank of sub-inspector or above on the scene of alleged violations 2 mentioned in challan Challan Id AP2008071983005 issued to the petitioner on 07.08.2020. (III)to return the amount of Rs.500/- which was wrongfully collected from the petitioner in Challan Id AP2008071983005. (IV)to provide an option in the e-challan portal to raise objection on any challan to be issued to petitioner in the future and to mention the name and contact number of the challaning officer or an officer senior to him whom the petitioner can approach in case of a grievance. (V)to afford a time of at least 60 days for the payment of any challan, if the petitioner wishes to compound the alleged traffic violation in the future. (VI)to quash the challan Echallan No AP21110939490028 dated 09.11.2021 as it ex fade does not depict the petitioner or his vehicle and order enquiry into the matter by a competent police/transport officer to ascertain the reasons for the vehicle in the picture carrying same registration number as that of the petitioner's vehicle and take measures to correct the anomaly so that the petitioner does not receive such wrong challans in the future. (VII)to award litigation expenses of Rs.50,000/- incurred by the petition towards lawyer fees, filing of the petition and transportation charges and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UMESH CHANDRA P V G Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 27702 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*