1 2025:CGHC:59830 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1819 of 2023 1 - Ram Das Anant S/o Late Buddhelal Anant Aged About 63 Years Retired Excise Sub Inspector, R/o Santoshi Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Excise, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Commissioner Office Of The Commissioner, Department Of Excise Gst Bhawan, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Divisional Joint Director Office Of The Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Account And Pension, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - District Excise Officer (Deo) Office Of District Excise Officer, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Chanda Bai W/o Shri Ramdas Anant Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Kukrachunda, Post Mohbhatta, P.S. Bhatapara, Tahsil Simga, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Asha W/o Ramdas Anant Aged About 62 Years R/o Bagbahara, P.S. And Tahsil Bagbahara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. U.R. Koshaley, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, G.A. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/12/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and directed the respondent to grant and release gratuity with interest within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. (ii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present matter has already been duly redressed by the concerned authorities, as the entire amount of gratuity payable to the petitioner has been released and paid. In view of the aforesaid development, the petitioner has no subsisting grievance and, therefore, does not wish to pursue the present petition any further. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat