Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56679 (PNJ)

TARUN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/4866/2025 · 2025-05-13

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4866-2025 DECIDED ON: 13.05.2025 TARUN .....PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr.Himanshu Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. A.G, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of the appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, with direction to respondent no.2 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the private respondents, and also protect petitioner and his family members from false implication as he along with his daughters have been summoned in the Police Station before the respondent no. 3 with a view of pressurized them to leave the residential house qua that the Court has granted the order of status- quo still the private respondents are extending the threats to cause the loss to Anuradha 2025.05.13 23:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4866-2025 2 the petitioner, thus the appropriate action may kindly be given to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to respondent No.2-the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar to decide the representation dated 10.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) within a time bound manner. 3. Without adverting to the merits of the case, the respondent No.2- the Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 10.04.2025 (Annexure P-2) by passing a speaking order in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 13.05.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.05.13 23:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document