Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56679 (AP)

T CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/4984/2023 · 2025-11-04

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010098812023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4984/2023 Between: 1. T CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO, S/O. RATTAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RIO. D.NO.2/29, WEST STREET, RAMKUR VILLAGE, J.PANGULUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT) 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (R W S AND S), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NH -16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT BAPATLA. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4984/2023 T CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO, S/O. RATTAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RIO. D.NO.2/29, WEST STREET, RAMKUR VILLAGE, J.PANGULUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. (ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM DISTRICT) ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (R W S AND S), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA 16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT BAPATLA. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI T CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO, S/O. RATTAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, RIO. D.NO.2/29, WEST STREET, RAMKUR VILLAGE, J.PANGULUR MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (R W S AND S), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA 16, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, PRAKASAM THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PANCHAYAT WING, BAPATLA 6. THE CHIEF ENGINEER III, RWS AND S DEPARTMENT, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT. 7. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 8. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PRAJA PARISHAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 9. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DIVISION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 10. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DIVISION, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 11. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, SUB DIVISION, ADDANKI, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents in non-compliance of Fund Transfer in respect of 2 works M.Book Nos. 80A/2011 and 71/A/2021 pursuant to 0 and M CPWS Schemes 14/15 FC grant to cost for the material supplied by the petitioner for repairs and maintanance for O and M CPWS Scheme in J.Pangulur, Martur and Ballikuruva Mandal, Bapatla District (Erstwhile Prakasam District) issued by 7th respondent., as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of the rules and regulations framed there under and offends under Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to comply with the said M-Book by paying amounts covered thereby to the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the funds through proper channel into the account of petitioner or any other concerned, towards amount payable pursuant to 2 works M.Book Nos. 80A/2011 and 71/A/2021 pursuant to 0 and M CPWS Schemes 14/15 FC grant to cost for the material supplied by the petitioner for repairs and maintanance for 0 and M CPWS Scheme in J.Pangulur, Martur and Ballikuruva Mandal, Bapatla District (Erstwhile Prakasam District) issued by 7th respondent, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER: Aggrieved by non-payment of bill amounts to the petitioner for execution of works under O&M CPWS scheme to Ramkur & Lakkavaram habitations in J.Panguluru & Martur Mandal, and Vaidena & 5 other habitations in Ballikurava Mandal, Prakasam District, for the year 2020-22, the present writ petition is filed. 2. Heard Sri T.Praveen Kumar, learned counsel representing Smt.Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the authorities have paid the entitled amounts so claimed by the petitioner and there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, prayed to close the writ petition. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 05th November, 2025 RKS