Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56661 (CHH)

GANESH RAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/868/2021 · 2025-08-20

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:42356-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 868 of 2021 1 - Ganesh Ram S/o Shri Manglu Ram Mathur, Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Mathpur District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2 - Rajaram S/o Kejha Jangde, Aged About 32 Years R/o Putki Khurd, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 3 - Rajkumar S/o Piluram Bhaskar, Aged About 40 Years R/o Singapur Dullapur, District Mungeli (Chhattisgarh), District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Raj Kumar S/o Ganesh Ram, Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Mathpur, Thana Kukdur, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 5 - Ramabal W/o Ganesh Ram, Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Mathpur, Thana Kukdur, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 6 - Latabai W/o Rajkumar Bhaskar, Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Dullapur, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh, District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.08.22 10:34:54 +0530 2 7 - Rajkumari W/o Rajaram Jangde Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Putki Thana Pandariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sho Kukdur District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh 2 - Indranibai Mathur W/o Shrawan Mathur Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Kumhi, Thana Pandatarai, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh, District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Rahul Pathak, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Shri Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No. 2 : Shri Ravipal Maheswari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 21.08.2025 1. Heard Shri Rahul Pathak, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Awadh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard 3 Shri Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/Respondent No. 1 and Shri Ravipal Maheshwari, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the present petition has become infructuous as the trial of the petitioners has ended in their acquittal. 3. In view of the above, the instant case is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Shoaib