Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56659 (AP)

BEELA VEERU NAIDU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/23572/2023 · 2025-11-21

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010453122023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23572 OF 2023 Between: 1. BEELA VEERU NAIDU, S/o. Late Rama Murthy, Aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/ o. Nagayyapeta Village, Devarapalli Mandal, Anakapalli District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Thullur Mandal, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, , Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalli District, Anakapalli. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, AnakapalliDivision, Anakapalli, Anakapalli District. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, , K. Kotapadu Circle Police Station, K. Kotapadu, Anakapalli District. 6. SubInspector of Police, , Devarapalli Police Station, Devarapalli, Anakapalli District. 7. The Station House Officer, Devarapalli Police Station, Devarapalli, Anakapalli District. 8. Beela Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Late Appala Suryanarayana, Aged 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagayyapeta Village, Devarapalli Mandal, Anakapalli District. 9. Beela Shambu Naidu, S/o. Late Appala Suryanarayana, Aged 37 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagayyapeta Village, Devarapalli Mandal, Anakapalli District. 10. Beela Parvathi, W/o. Srinivasa Rao, Aged 28 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagayyapeta Village, Devarapalli Mandal, Anakapalli District. 11. TamatapuYerikamma, W/o. Krishna, Aged 42years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Nagayyapeta Village, Devarapalli Mandal, Anakapalli District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to prayed Hon'ble writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Police Authorities in not registering the complaint dated 12-07-2023 and not taking action against the representation dated 23-08-2023 made by the petitioner and not protecting the Petitioner from the Respondents 8 to 11 as illegal and unconstitutionaland violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India apart from violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to take action against the respondents 8 to 11 as per law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to enquire and take necessary action on the Petitioner's complaint dated 12-07-2023 and representation dated 23-08-2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 23572 OF 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “….pleased to prayed Hon'ble writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Police Authorities in not registering the complaint dated 12-07-2023 and not taking action against the representation dated 23-08-2023 made by the petitioner and not protecting the Petitioner from the Respondents 8 to 11 as illegal and unconstitutionaland violative of Art. 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India apart from violation of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents to take action against the respondents 8 to 11 as per law and pass…” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents, on written instructions, would submit that since the subject matter in the present petition is civil in nature, the respondent police have not registered the crime against the unofficial respondents on the complaint dated 12-07-2023 and the representation dated 23.08.2023 made by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no Order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22-11-2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.23572 of 2023 Dated.22-11-2025 KKV 68 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.23572 of 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 22.11.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV