Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56651 (CHH)

BHIMA MADKAMI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/3504/2025 · 2025-11-18

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56332 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3504 of 2025 Bhima Madkami S/o Late Deva Madkami Aged About 23 Years Caste Koya, R/o Titveri Thana Malkangiri, District Malkangiri, Odisha. ... Petitioner versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Sukuma, District Sukuma, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 19.11.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 01.05.2025, passed in MCRC No. 1988 of 2025, while allowing the bail to the petitioner, namely, Bhima Madkami, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), South Bastar Dantewada, District – South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) through learned Principal RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 District and Sessions Judge, South Bastar Dantewada, District – South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 31.10.2025 has requested for grant of 04 month’s time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that the present case is at the stage of prosecution evidence, and some of the prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined by the trial Court, the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of 04 month’s time for concluding the trial. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of 04 months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar