2025:HHC:11013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 884 of 2025 a/w CWP No. 1168 of 2025 Decided on : 24.04.2025 1. CWP No. 884 of 2025 Nitin Mukesh and another. …Petitioners Versus National Highway Authority of India and others. …Respondents 2. CWP No. 1168 of 2025 Jyoti Prakash and another. …Petitioners Versus National Highway Authority of India and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : M/s Bhushree Jain and Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocates, in both petitions. For the respondents : Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 to 3, in both petitions. Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.4, in both petitions. 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:11013 Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.5, in both petitions. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that after the filing of the writ petitions, in terms of the reply filed by respondents No. 3 & 5, as the compensation to which the petitioners were entitled to, already stands paid to them, the petitions have served their purpose. She further submits that the petition can be disposed, in view of said development. 2. In the light of the submissions so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as the petitions have served their purpose, the proceedings are disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge April 24, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)