1 2025:CGHC:42541 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8291 of 2025 1 - Chandrikeshwar Prasad Tiwari S/o Omprakash Tiwari, Aged About 56 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher At Government Primary School, Kharharibadi, Block Khadwagan District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002 2 - The Director, Directorate of Public Instruction Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh 492002 3 - The Collector, Collector Complex, District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 4974422 4 - The Collector, Collector Complex, District Koriya Chhattisgarh 5 - The Sub Divisional Magistrate (Revenue) President Of Block Level Committee Block Khadwagan District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 497449 6 - The District Education Officer, Deo, Office, And Secretary District Yuktiyuktkaran (Rationalization) Committee District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 497442 7 - The District Education Officer, Deo, Office, And Secretary District Yuktiyuktkaran (Rationalization) Committee District Koriya Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 8 - The Block Education Officer, Block Khadwagan District Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 497449 ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 21-08-2025 1. This is second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation the writ petition filed by the petitioner against his transfer order after declaring surplus Teacher under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions, was disposed of with liberty to move fresh representation and in turn the District Rationalization Committee was directed to decide the same within specific time period. Now this petition has been filed after rejection of representation filed by the petitioner. 2. The counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the State Government has now constituted another Committee headed by the Divisional Commissioner vide notification dated 07-07-2025 for redressal of the grievances against the decision taken by the District/Divisional Rationalization Committee on the representation moved by the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation before the Committee constituted vide notification dated 07-07-2025 and the Committee be directed to decide the same within stipulated time period. 3. Learned counsel for the State does not have any objection if such a direction is given to the said Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07- 2025. 4. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in favour of the petitioner to move/pursue his detailed representation to the Committee constituted under notification dated 07-07-2025 raising all the 3 grievances and the Committee, in turn, shall decide the same on its own merits in accordance with law as early as possible in objective manner, by passing the reasoned order in view of the grievance raised by the petitioner. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil