Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010754982018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36458/2018 Between:
1. MOHAN REDDY ENAGANURI,, S/O. CHINA VENKATA REDDY ENAGANURI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS, R/O. YERRABALLIPALEM, VINJAMUR,
NELLORE, ANDHRA PRADESH-524228. ...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, DR. RAJENDER PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI
2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2ND FLOOR, CORPORATE BHAWAN,THATTIANNARAM, GSI POST, BANDLAGUDA, NAGOLE, HYDERABAD - 500 068
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto Issue a writ of mandamus or a writ of any other nature or direction declaring that to issue a Writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring a that the list of directors placed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs MCA on its website i e www mca gov in as arbitrary illegal without jurisdiction contrary of the provisions of the Companies Act 2013 and Rule 11 of the Companies Appointment of Directors Rules 2014 violative of the principles of natural justice besides violating the
2 JS,J W.P.No.36458/2018
Petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14 and Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and quash / set aside the same to the extent it declares / treats the Petitioners as disqualified in terms of Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act 2013 in the interest of justice b that the Petitioners are not disqualified in terms of Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act 2013 for the reason of alleged default of non filing financial statements / Annual Returns, writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or directing the Respondent Nos 1 and 2 to restore the DIN numbers of Petitioner i.e. Mohan Reddy Enaganuri - DIN.
02720838, and to permit the Petitioners to file / submit forms / e forms pertaining to pending financial statements and / or annual returns of the companies and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to restore the DIN number of Petitioner i.e. Mohan Reddy Enaganuri - DIN: 02720838, so as to enable the Petitioner to comply with the statutory requirements under law and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. LEELA PRASAD MALLELA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
3 JS,J W.P.No.36458/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the DIN number of the petitioner was activated. Hence, no further orders are required in the writ petition. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Date: 09.12.2025 KAS
4 JS,J W.P.No.36458/2018
151
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 36458/2018
Date: 09.12.2025 KAS