Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56627 (AP)

P V RAMA RAJU v. G ANATHA RAMU

CC/4615/2024 · 2025-11-27

Subba Reddy Satti

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010563392024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4615/2024 Between: 1. P V RAMA RAJU, S/O P. KOTAM RAJU, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC. HOSTEL WELFARE OFFICER, GOVT. BC BOYS HOSTEL, JONNALAGADDA, NTR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. G ANATHA RAMU, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, NELAPADU AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DR A MALLIKARJUNA I A S, THE DIRECTOR BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DR G LAKSHMISHA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NTR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. K SRINIVASA RAO, THE DISTRICT BC WELFARE AND EMPOWERMENT OFFICER NTR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. P SRINIVASA RAO, THE ASST BC WELFARE OFFICER NANDIGAMA DIVISION NTR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for wilful, wanton and deliberately disobeying the orders of the Hon'ble Court dated 04.11.2024 in I.A.No. 1 of 2024 in WP No.24861 of 2024 in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to delete the names of the respondent nos. 1,2,4&5 as a party to this Contempt Petition as they are not necessary parties to this Contempt Petition in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 04.11.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.24861 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 04.11.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.24861 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 28.11.2025 TVN 384 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.4615 OF 2024 Date: 28.11.2025 TVN