APHC010541722014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35358/2014 Between: 1. G.VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O.12-17-18, PRAKASHNAGAR,NARASARAOPSET,GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,NEW DELHI 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES KOTI HYDERABAD, - 3. KAPIL CHIT FUND PRIVATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO.3-1-631, CAPT VIAJAY RAGHUNANDAN NAGAR, KARIMNAGAR, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT 4. KAPIL CHIT KOSTA PRVIATE LIMITED, REP.BY ITS MANAGIGN DIRETOR, D.NO.40-14-3/1,CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, BENZ CIRCLE,VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. KAPIL INFRA AVENUES PVT LTD, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 3-1-188, CVRN NAGAR,KARIMNAGAR,KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT 6. RAMYA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD, REP.BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.NO.40-14-3/1 CHANDRAMOULIPURAM, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA,KRISHNA DISTRICT 2 JS,J W.P.No.35358/2014 7. M/S KAPIL FOODS AND STRUCTURES PVT LTD, REP.BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, H.NO.2-5-760, SUBEDARI, OPP:DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE,HANAMKONDA, WARANGAL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not taking action on the complaint /representation of the petitioners dated 18.4.2013 for initiation of proceedings under Indian Companies Act 1956 against the respondents 3 to 7 for violations in diversion of funds under false scheme cheating and diversion of funds having issued compliant notices in 2013 is illegal, arbitrary, and contrary to the provisions of Indian companies Act 1956 and consequently direct the respondents Nos.1 to 2 to take further stepts pursuant to the show cause notices issued to the respondents 3 to 7 in the year 2013 under Indian companies Act 1956 on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 18.4.2013 and to seize all the books accounts and assets of the respondents 3 to 7 for appropriate action and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 44222 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take aCTION ON THE COMPLAINTS representation of the petitioner dated 18.4.2013 for initiating appropriate action as per law against the respondetns 3 to 7 pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 52711 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the W.P. No. 35358 of 2014 by fixing an early date to meet the ends of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M JANARDHAN RAO 3 JS,J W.P.No.35358/2014 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO 3. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI The Court made the following ORDER: Sri M. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, appeared through online and submits that cause in the writ petition does not survive. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS 4 JS,J W.P.No.35358/2014 243 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 35358/2014 Dated: 12.11.2025 KAS