Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5662 (KAR)

DR ASHMITA PADMA ALIAS PRIYADARSHINI v. BHIMANNA S/O. NARASAPPA AMBIGER, DECEASED

WP/105958/2023 · 2025-03-19

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5050 WP No. 105958 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 105958 OF 2023 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: DR. ASHMITA PADMA @ PRIYADARSHINI D/O. BHIMANNA AMBIGER, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR, R/O: VIDYAGIRI, II MAIN, DHARWAD-580 030. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARUN L. NEELOPANT, SMT. KAVITA JADHAV AND SRI. N.B. JODALLI, ADVOCATES-ABSENT) AND: 1. BHIMANNA S/O. NARASAPPA AMBIGER, DECEASED SMT. MEENAXI ALLEGED W/O. BIMANNA AMBIGER, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: H.H. WORK, R/O: GANDHINAGAR, 4TH MAIN, DHARWAD-580 030. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HAVERI, DISTRICT: HAVERI-581 110. 3. THE CHIEF OFFICER, ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, SECTION SUPERINTENDENT, NRUPATUNG ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R1; SRI. GURUDEV I.GACHHINAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R3) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5050 WP No. 105958 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 05.03.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the petition was ordered to be listed on 19.03.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/CLK LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 57