Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 56617 (AP)

CHATARASUPALLI DHANA LAKSHMI KALADINDI DHANA LAKSHMI v. CHATARASUPALLI MAHESH

TRCMP/195/2025 · 2025-11-04

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010329352025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 195/2025 Between: 1. CHATARASUPALLI DHANA LAKSHMI KALADINDI DHANA LAKSHMI, W/O. MAHESH, D/O. KALADINDI RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-76, KALAPARRU VILLAGE, PETAPADU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHATARASUPALLI MAHESH, S/o. Koteswara Rao, aged about 31 years, R/o. D.No.10-46/2, 1st Floor, Flat No. FI, Murughan Nagar, Villivakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu State. ...RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased topleased to withdraw the F.C.O.P No.834 of 2024, on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Guntur, and transfer the same to the Judge, Family Court, Eluru, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in F.C.O.P No.834 of 2024, on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Guntur and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.195 of 2025 ORDER: Today, when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he had addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial) dated 16.10.2025, stating that the petitioner intends to withdraw the present matter. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and he also endorsed the same on the grounds of the bundle to that effect. 3. Permission is granted. 4. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date.05.11.2025 CVD/KS